Ainsworth, Meters. S., M. C. Blehar, E. Seas and you will S. Wall surface (1978), Activities out-of accessory: An emotional study of the fresh StrangeSituation, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Bartholomew, K. and you will L. Yards. Horowitz (1991), ‘Attachment styles certainly one of teenagers: A test of a several-class model’, Journal out-of Identification and you can Societal Therapy, 61, 22644
Brennan, K. A good., C. L. Clark and you may P. Roentgen. Shaver (1998), ‘Self-declaration dimensions out-of mature personal connection: A keen integrative more- view’, when you look at the J. A. Simpson and you can W. S. Rholes (eds.), Connection idea and you will close matchmaking, Nyc: Guilford Force, pp. 4676
Feeney, J. A. and you will P. Noller (1990), ‘Attachment build as an effective predictor off adult close relationships’, Record away from Character and you can Public Mindset, 58, 28191
Feeney, J. A good. and you may S. M. Ryan (1994), ‘Attachment layout and you may inspired regulation: Dating having health and conclusion and you can family skills out of problems into the students sample’, Health Therapy, 13, 334-forty five
Fraley, Roentgen. C. and you may P. Roentgen. Shaver (2000), ‘Adult connection: Theoretical advancements, growing controversies, and you can unanswered questions’, Report about Standard Therapy, cuatro, 13254
Fraley, R. C and Letter. G. Waller (1998), Mature accessory models: An examination of one’s typological model, Ny: Guilford Force
Hazan, C. and you can P. R. Razor (1987), ‘Romantic like conceptualized as the an accessory process’, Diary out-of Character and Public Psychology, 52, 51124
Hendrick, C. and S. Hendrick (1986), ‘A theory and you may method of love’, Journal regarding Identification and you will Societal Therapy, fifty, 3924 02
Levy, K. Letter., S. J. Blatt, and you will P. Roentgen. Razor (1998), ‘Attachment appearance and you may parental representations’, Log from Character and you can Personal Mindset, 74, 40719
Chief, Yards. (1990), ‘Cross-social studies away from connection teams: Present education, modifying techniques, additionally the notion of conditional strategies’, People Innovation, 33, 486 step one
Mikulincer, Meters., P. R. Razor, Y. Sapir-Lavid and you may Letter. Avihou-Kanza (2009), ‘What’s in brains away from safely and insecurely attached people? The fresh secure-base program as well as connections having connection-concept dimensions’, Log out-of Identity and you can Social Therapy, 97,6153 step 3
Ainsworth mais aussi al.(1978) checked the Bowlby’s suggestions having fun with a lab take to known as ‘strange situation’. Infants and their caregivers was basically split right after which reunited just after a beneficial limited time, over a series of symptoms. From this experiment, Ainsworth along with her associates developed a beneficial around three-class model of attachment appearance, secure, stressed and avoidant. Though Ainsworth et al. (1978) unearthed that most infants had a safe connection concept, the different attachment appearances noticed inform you the real difference in the manner the newest attachment system is organized, a main section of the child’s perception out of if new caregiver might possibly be available and receptive if needed (Collins and study, 1990).
Fraley and you will Waller (1998) better if a shift try called for on a steady research of attachment concept, which produces multiple results. In the early 1990s a several-class model was advised (Bartholomew and you can Griffin, 1991) and was created because the a continuing aspect from adult connection. Bartholomew and you may Horowitz (1991) developed a several-category model (Secure, Preoccupied, Fearful-Avoidant and you can Dismissing-Avoidant) to assess mature accessory. Considering which, Griffin and Bartholomew (1994) continued to develop the connection Level Questionnaire. It scale is actually a 30-goods adult attachment questionnaire you to definitely talks about relationship top quality and you can adult accessory which can be centered on an ongoing level.
When delegating people towards the attachment looks, with regards to this new correlations, the next strategy are functioning. Into the parental caregiving style questionnaire (Hazan and you will Shaver, 1986, cited into the Collins and read, 1990), people rated the 3 comments because the enjoying/secure moms and dad/caregiver, anxious/ambivalent otherwise cooler caregiver. For each and every participant a rating obtained to the enjoying caregiver; the typical try obtained from the brand new anxious/ambivalent or cooler caregiver get and you may try titled an enthusiastic ‘insecure caregiver score’.
Firstly, the new strategies for the feeling away from an early on caregiver was indeed care about accounts, in the place of behavioural findings, additionally the most recent studies targets how some body ‘think’ these were raised which is dissimilar to exactly what indeed took place. However, due to go out constraints it wasn’t you’ll to accomplish this over a longitudinal analysis; although not, this should be sensed to have coming search.
My investment supervisor and i also will simply comprehend the forms and you can solutions you provide. You are depicted in this try out by the lots, in fact it is conveyed near the top of your own questionnaires. Ergo, you will will always be totally anonymous contained in this experiment.
1= not really anything like me 2= barely like me step three= a bit just like me cuatro= will just like me 5= extremely anything like me